Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9  (all builds)
Memory120.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 01:16
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7960X-$347
CPU0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 73.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 929
83% 702 Pts
64-Core 2,491
154% 2,491 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 193
Parallax 177
170% 193 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 175
Splatting 124
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 140%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 506 509 508 510 508 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 130%
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320
553GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 468 467 467 467 468 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 476
Mixed 421
SusWrite 468
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 51.9
179% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
267% 359 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 120%
Great: 130%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
625GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1409 1403 1400 1397 1401 1404 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,193
Write 1,705
Mixed 1,164
SusWrite 1,402
361% 1,616 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 68
237% 88.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,197
DQ Write 1,068
DQ Mixed 1,076
823% 1,114 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 297%
Great: 363%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 180 183 184 179 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 149
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 179
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.7
220% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 119 124 125 117 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 56.2
Write 95.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 119
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
198% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 33.6
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 9.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback