MSI Z68A-GD65 (MS-7681)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7681
MotherboardMSI Z68A-GD65 (MS-7681)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 01 '16 at 00:00
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 195
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 390
52% 390 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
MSI(1462 293A) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 26.9
19% 26.2 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 31.3
21% 24.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67% Good
Read 502
Write 388
Mixed 436
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 13.7
73% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 57.1
DQ Mixed 13.3
18% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67%
Great: 86%
Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB (2014)-$220
2TB free
Firmware: CC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 151
Write 155
Mixed 132
110% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.29
92% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 88%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1333EL Series Kingston 99U5403-043.A00LF 8502 1333EL Series Kingston 99U5403-043.A00LF 16GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.6% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68A-GD65 (MS-7681) Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z68A-GD65 (MS-7681)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback