Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '16 at 22:03
Run Duration	730 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110 23,169 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 91 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 201 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 503 56% 442 Pts	64-Core 509 32% 509 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 360C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.95 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Lighting 45.8 Reflection 39.5 Parallax 53.3 37% 46.2 fps	MRender 54.3 Gravity 51.5 Splatting 37.7 38% 47.8 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 33024795 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 138066018703487 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2413 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 128 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 44 51542491162 (C2) HDA temperature 26 44 51542491162 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 33024795 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 33024795 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 33024795 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 25267 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8414 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8414 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9165	64.4% Good	Read 473 Write 196 Mixed 252 67% 307 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 14.1 93% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 32.9 56% 108 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 99 28280128 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3316 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 4361365704 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 6108 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2396 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 50 60600418332 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 110 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 73 73 54687 (C2) HDA temperature 28 50 -140737488355300 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 95515777700842 (F1) Unknown 100 253 52504455286 (F2) Unknown 100 253 47105122179	84.2% Excellent	Read 145 Write 149 Mixed 150 112% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.31 96% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 114%
TDK LoR TF10 4GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID 0619 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	3.98% Terrible	Read 15 Write 3.87 Mixed 5.23 8% 8.02 MB/s	4K Read 3.93 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.004 15% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.98% Great: 5%
CBM Flash Disk 1GB 454 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 6025 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.93% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 2.1 Mixed 3.42 5% 5.01 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 18% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.93% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2133 C9 2x4GB 349 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 19 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 9.6 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X79-UP4 Builds (Compare 907 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 - $480

CPU
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	286x
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	198x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	188x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	57x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	47x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	21x

RAM
DDR3 1866 4x4GBAdataBench 68%, 420 samples	24x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 60%, 738 samples	16x
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 2,734 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $944

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16