EVGA Classified SR-2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory46GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 46GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA Classified SR-2  (all builds)
Memory39.7 GB free of 46 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '19 at 06:11
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 95
1-Core 110
2-Core 208
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 714
71% 577 Pts
64-Core 1,633
101% 1,633 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2069 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 28 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 72%
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
59GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 163 163 161 162 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 334
Write 219
Mixed 240
SusWrite 163
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 25.1
86% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 144
121% 177 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 91%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
31GB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 99 95 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 66.5
Write 76
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 103
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
39GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 73 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 65.5
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 71.4
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 70%
WD Re 2TB-$35
44GB free
Firmware: 01.01D01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 74 72 70 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 129
Write 116
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 71.5
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
198% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
62GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 73 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 132
Write 106
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 71.5
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
116GB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 68 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 96.2
Write 103
Mixed 55
SusWrite 68.3
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
163GB free
Firmware: 1118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 77.2
Write 87.5
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 97.7
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 58%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
32GB free
Firmware: 04.04V03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 73 72 70 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43% Average
Read 77.8
Write 75.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 71.4
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43%
Great: 69%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
53GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 102 101 103 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 81.2
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 102
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56%
Great: 79%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
9GB free
Firmware: 4V06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 104 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 74
Write 78.2
Mixed 59
SusWrite 103
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 69%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
1GB free
Firmware: 5G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 91 87 91 94 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 99
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 92.4
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 79%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
51GB free
Firmware: 4V06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 77 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 75.3
Write 76
Mixed 59
SusWrite 77.7
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 2000EL Series 2000EL Series Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2000EL Series M... 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 57
70% 57 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Classified SR-2 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $922
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback