TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory92.2 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 21:22
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 210
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 736
69% 572 Pts
64-Core 2,022
125% 2,022 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 82.9%
 Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 1E07) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3569 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 183
Parallax 223
119% 184 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 219
Splatting 149
164% 208 fps
Poor: 128% ↑
This bench: 127%
 Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 2TB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1233 1054 146 397 345 283 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 62%
HyperX Savage 480GB-$198
82GB free
Firmware: 001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 444 422 439 426 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 358
Write 432
Mixed 310
SusWrite 435
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 37.3
134% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 67.4
104% 198 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 93.9%
 Great: 97%
HyperX Savage 480GB-$198
93GB free
Firmware: 001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 445 427 437 437 435 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 365
Write 471
Mixed 313
SusWrite 437
90% 396 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 37.4
134% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 67.2
104% 199 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 94.5%
 Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD HMT451R7AFR8C-RD HMT41GR7BFR4C-RD HMT451R7AFR8C-RD HMT451R7AFR8C-RD HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD ... 96GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 65.8
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 41.1
135% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.8
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 100% ↑
This bench: 114%
 Great: 114%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples115x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples87x
GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples146x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples67x
SSD
860 500GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,934 samples55x
860 1TBSamsungBench 86%, 2,531 samples38x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples32x
RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples19x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback