ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator PH517-51

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Acer Predator PH517-51 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Cayman_CFS
Memory	25 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '19 at 16:38
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-8950HK 14,729 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	90% Outstanding	Memory 86.8 1-Core 135 2-Core 248 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 864 83% 682 Pts	64-Core 1,030 64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Acer(1025 1243) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.28 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Lighting 97.1 Reflection 103 Parallax 105 79% 102 fps	MRender 94.3 Gravity 95.3 Splatting 95.5 78% 95.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$130 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 687GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1703 1549 1391 1202 1196 1228 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	268% Outstanding	Read 1,822 Write 1625 Mixed 1117 SusWrite 1,378 333% 1,486 MB/s	4K Read 59.3 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 66.2 240% 83.1 MB/s	DQ Read 867 DQ Write 811 DQ Mixed 863 641% 847 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 268% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 286GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7,842 Write 7,142 Mixed 6,728 1,614% 7,237 MB/s	4K Read 552 4K Write 252 4K Mixed 300 1,355% 368 MB/s	DQ Read 1,196 DQ Write 813 DQ Mixed 907 703% 972 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$130 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 282GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1818 1941 1302 994 1031 1050 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	283% Outstanding	Read 1,992 Write 1,694 Mixed 989 SusWrite 1,356 337% 1,508 MB/s	4K Read 58.1 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 76.6 251% 85.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,030 DQ Write 887 DQ Mixed 944 712% 954 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 283% Great: 372%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 4x16GB 245 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 28.4 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 26 77% 26.8 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Predator PH517-51 Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 49%

Yacht

System: Acer Predator PH517-51

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	429x
Core i9-8950HKIntelBench 74%, 14,729 samples	153x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	583x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	3x

SSD
HFS256GD9MNE-6200A 256GBBench 190%, 1,347 samples	51x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	40x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	39x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 6,230 samples	130x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	110x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback