Asrock X58 Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X58 Extreme  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 14:49
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5649
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 97.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 223
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 703
71% 574 Pts
64-Core 826
51% 826 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 42.9
Parallax 38.3
37% 42.2 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 35
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 246 241 246 245 249 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
77.8% Very good
Read 264
Write 252
Mixed 252
SusWrite 246
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 42.6
139% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 194
146% 196 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 129%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 4GB
1GB free, PID 1167
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5.2 6.7 6.8 6.8 6.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Read 10.3
Write 6.7
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 6.4
10% 7.42 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 7%
 8GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5 5.2 5.1 5.4 5.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Read 24
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.1
10% 9.45 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 6 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.4% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 49.6
81% 49.6 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Extreme Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock X58 Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $207
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback