Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '19 at 03:05
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 60.5 2-Core 117 53% 85.3 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 329 32% 264 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design 1,537 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Asus(1043 1B5E) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2546 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Lighting 10 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 27.2 8% 16.2 fps	MRender 24.8 Gravity 28.2 Splatting 21.9 20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB 3,311 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 216 216 213 214 215 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 395 Write 373 Mixed 308 SusWrite 232 73% 327 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 26.4 77% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 281 230% 328 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 92%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 120 121 125 126 127 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 116 Write 114 Mixed 56.8 SusWrite 124 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB 6,645 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	70.6% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 22.5 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 17.6 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	131x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	86x
GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 21%, 1,537 samples	45x

SSD
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	81x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	17x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	5x

RAM
M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 6,645 samples	131x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16