Acer Aspire V3-571

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V3-571  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA50_HC_HR
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 02:42
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 86.8
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 133
62% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 191
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Acer(1025 0645) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2669
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 4
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.65 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.06 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 26 79 157 114 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.4% Below average
Read 265
Write 252
Mixed 275
SusWrite 130
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 11.2
35% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 88.5
DQ Write 84.8
DQ Mixed 42.7
44% 72 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FH8NZPHSCG SH564128FH8NZPHSCR 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-571 Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-571

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback