Apple iMac11,3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemApple iMac11,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F2238BAE
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '19 at 16:04
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 151
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 294
38% 290 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5800 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)
Apple(106B 00CC) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.97.0.0
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
8.87% Terrible
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 8.62
Parallax 9.62
10% 9.99 fps
MRender 8.71
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 10
8% 9.09 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.87%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 128 129 146 144 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 127
Write 122
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 133
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 14.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac11,3 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac11,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback