Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80% Very good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 105 2-Core 206 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 395 52% 391 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3655) 1GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 20.3 Reflection 19.1 Parallax 24.6 16% 21.3 fps	MRender 26.6 Gravity 24.7 Splatting 22.7 20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 18%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 256GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 87 82 88 86 81 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 81.4 Write 87.9 Mixed 51 SusWrite 83.1 56% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 17 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 18.1 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	59x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	58x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	52x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	17x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	13x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $454