Apple MacBookPro11,5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro11,5  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-06F11F11946D27C5
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '19 at 09:30
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4870HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 552
60% 474 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 M370X
Apple(106B 0149) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 17.9
11% 15 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 15.6
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0512G PCIe 500GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW1SA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1458 1471 1477 1379 1195 1174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,266
Write 1,361
Mixed 819
SusWrite 1,359
271% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 28.9
115% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 630
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 576
414% 539 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 192%
Great: 223%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x31364B544631473634485A2D314736453120 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 20.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.6
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro11,5 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro11,5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback