HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cd0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cd0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8354
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '19 at 04:20
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User NIC-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 58
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 98.2
44% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 155
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8354) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.63% Terrible
Lighting 8.07
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 11.1
7% 9.58 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 8.83
Splatting 8.74
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.63%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDRE480GB 480GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0614D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 318 317 324 349 346 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 409
Write 357
Mixed 284
SusWrite 328
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 22.3
78% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 94.5
DQ Mixed 101
79% 109 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Adata 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.8% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.1
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cd0xx Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cd0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback