Asus Rampage III Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage III Extreme  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111003
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 04:22
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 96
2-Core 195
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 525
56% 445 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 118
Parallax 116
90% 115 fps
MRender 96.2
Gravity 103
Splatting 84.7
76% 94.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 38 20 18 19 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 330
Write 166
Mixed 111
SusWrite 27.6
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 12.7
51% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 72%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
51GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 193 205 205 205 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 345
Write 210
Mixed 261
SusWrite 180
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 34.5
118% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 81.3
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 122
95% 127 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 21
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 12
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage III Extreme Builds (Compare 751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback