Gigabyte GA-E350N-USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-E350N-USB3  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110110
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 22:23
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-350
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Memory 53.1
1-Core 10.6
2-Core 30.4
24% 31.4 Pts
4-Core 28.6
8-Core 26.8
4% 27.7 Pts
64-Core 31.9
2% 31.9 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Zotac(19DA 1044) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.32 fps
MRender 1.19
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.43
1% 0.96 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TD27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 69 60 72 68 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 55.8
Write 70.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 67.5
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 58%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-65A7B0 500GB
156GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 33 33 31 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 33.3
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 32.4
44% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 1.2
SC Mixed 1.9
4% 1.43 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-E350N-USB3 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-E350N-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $282
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback