HP 23-g009

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP 23-g009  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B06
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140317
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 20:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A6-5200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
23.5% Poor
1-Core 34.5
2-Core 69.3
24% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 127
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 131
9% 131 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 24%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
HP(103C 2B06) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 12
Parallax 6.3
2% 9 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 7.8
2% 6.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
695GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 40 68 128 129 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 157
Write 146
Mixed 106
SusWrite 95.3
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7.1
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 34%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 23-g009 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 23-g009

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback