Samsung 550P5C/550P7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 550P5C/550P7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 18:17
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 170
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 432
47% 373 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M
Sanyo(144D C0D1) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.56
4% 4.29 fps
MRender 6.05
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.48 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,763
Write 26
Mixed 43.5
265% 1,277 MB/s
4K Read 405
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 4.3
620% 137 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.3% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550P5C/550P7C Builds (Compare 603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550P5C/550P7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback