Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 09:35
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
30.6% Below average
1-Core 45.9
2-Core 87.3
32% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 176
24% 175 Pts
64-Core 172
12% 172 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.09% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 5.6
2% 5.23 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 14.6
2% 10 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.09%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Team T253TD120G 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0410A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 162 138 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 349
Write 318
Mixed 313
SusWrite 159
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 11.4
46% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 97.5
120% 211 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x1.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
29.9% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 30%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical string Builds (Compare 1,867 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback