PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
Memory | 10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170502 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 16 '19 at 03:14 |
Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Extreme |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
66.8%
Good
|
71% 152 Pts
|
57% 441 Pts
|
35% 516 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$187
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.20
|
55.8%
Above average
|
55% 198 fps
|
56% 171 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$60
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 315 319 317 309 308 MB/s
|
85.8%
Excellent
|
76% 338 MB/s
|
123% 45.2 MB/s
|
174% 252 MB/s
|
![]() |
1,085% 4,864 MB/s
|
866% 242 MB/s
|
345% 465 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Hynix HMA451R7AFR8N-UH 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
96% 33.4 GB/s
|
53% 18.4 GB/s
|
62% 64.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 65%, 3,843 samples | 874x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 72%, 2,688 samples | 455x |
Xeon E5-1620 v4IntelBench 68%, 1,331 samples | 447x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 18%, 7,269 samples | 528x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 3,843 samples | 235x |
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 10%, 8,674 samples | 218x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 10% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |