Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 94.3 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 163 70% 115 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 363 38% 303 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 190 168 165 164 156 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.6% Good	Read 242 Write 231 Mixed 225 SusWrite 179 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 52.2 4K Mixed 32.5 98% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 196 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 124%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 936GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 118 118 118 118 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 120 Write 113 Mixed 75.9 SusWrite 118 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown V01D3LF4GB26826813 V01D3LF4GB26826813 V01D3LF4GB26826813 V01D3LF4GB26826813 16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 13 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 13.2 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 59.1 68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	22x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	24x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	9x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	5x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $348

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16