Asrock B365 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B365 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190114
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 10:06
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 739
77% 616 Pts
64-Core 740
46% 740 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Device(7377 2001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2128 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.7% Good
Lighting 78
Reflection 78.3
Parallax 67.7
64% 74.7 fps
MRender 75.3
Gravity 72.7
Splatting 74.9
61% 74.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 51 97 88 85 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.8% Poor
Read 232
Write 94.5
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 92.3
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 11.6
46% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 22
DQ Mixed 19.7
15% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
550GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 151 150 151 152 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 138
Write 138
Mixed 69
SusWrite 150
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365 Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback