MSI MS-1792

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE72 2QC
MotherboardMSI MS-1792  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160705
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 14 '19 at 19:43
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 224
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 572
61% 485 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 5600
MSI(1462 1139) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Lighting 5.87
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 7.09
5% 10.2 fps
MRender 7.62
Gravity 5.47
Splatting 10.2
7% 7.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39MNC-3310A 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20001P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 113 80 83 77 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 308
Write 200
Mixed 276
SusWrite 99.8
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 30.7
116% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 235
183% 257 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 92%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
393GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 101 103 103 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 96
Write 90.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 103
56% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 99U5428-078.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1792 Builds (Compare 300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1792

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback