ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 3664AN1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo 3664AN1 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180313
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '19 at 18:27
Run Duration	106 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1290 V2 222 User benchmarks, average bench 76% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 87.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 220 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 523 60% 467 Pts	64-Core 537 33% 537 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 83CC) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.55 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.66 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HCC545050A7E380 500GB 1,382 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 385GB free (System drive) Firmware: GG2OAC90 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 59 73 79 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 93.5 Write 98 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 74.8 55% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	50% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 14.9 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback