Asus P5Q-E

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q-E (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '19 at 16:02
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5460-$190 10,360 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	52.8% Above average	Memory 71 1-Core 49.6 2-Core 100 46% 73.5 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 202 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 197 12% 197 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 847A) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 368.81 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.1% Poor	Lighting 32.6 Reflection 27.3 Parallax 28.9 27% 29.6 fps	MRender 35.2 Gravity 25.6 Splatting 31.4 25% 30.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188 11,188 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 127 121 124 123 94 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.2% Above average	Read 202 Write 122 Mixed 156 SusWrite 116 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 59.9 4K Mixed 30.2 114% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 24.3 49% 100 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 80%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 81GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 82 82 81 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 73.1 Write 71.7 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 81 52% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 62%
WD My Book 500GB 3,986 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 110GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 27.9 Write 26.3 Mixed 22.9 SusWrite 26.6 35% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	22% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 6.7 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 99 40% 99 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q-E Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-E

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	55x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	18x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	16x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	14x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	7x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Q300 120GBToshibaBench 70%, 1,888 samples	7x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	6x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	129x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	24x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16