ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hitachi Advanced Server DS225 1S5BZZZ0023

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Hitachi Advanced Server DS225 1S5BZZZ0023 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hitachi S5BV-MB (LBG-4)
Memory	250.4 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '19 at 23:18
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6240 25 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU_0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 82.9 2-Core 166 64% 110 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 664 59% 501 Pts	64-Core 2,496 154% 2,496 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 83%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KB038T8 4TB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: XCV10110 SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 413 413 414 314 413 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 278 Write 413 Mixed 323 SusWrite 396 80% 353 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 57.3 4K Mixed 29.5 100% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 260 204% 283 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A8K40B22-CWD 4x31.8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 4 of 24 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	61.4% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 21.3 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback