MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B85
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '19 at 21:09
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 222
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 784
70% 592 Pts
64-Core 1,404
87% 1,404 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1500 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 62.1
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 77.9
51% 72.2 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 60
Splatting 61.8
53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 604 225 220 220 215 217 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2317
Write 1,474
Mixed 942
SusWrite 284
276% 1,254 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 70.8
227% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 893
DQ Mixed 903
685% 921 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 223%
Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
144GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 459 464 470 475 474 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 476
Mixed 402
SusWrite 463
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 56.7
185% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
124GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 62 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 29.7
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 62
34% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
53GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 92 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 91.5
Mixed 65
SusWrite 91.2
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown INNO8G2400S 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 28.4
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 24.7
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) Builds (Compare 4,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $589
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback