Asrock B365 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B365 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '19 at 10:38
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 283
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,031
97% 803 Pts
64-Core 883
55% 883 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 205
Parallax 202
157% 199 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 187
Splatting 131
121% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1450 399 394 401 400 401 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2,278
Write 2,092
Mixed 1,470
SusWrite 574
358% 1,603 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 54.9
178% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,005
DQ Write 1,515
DQ Mixed 1,166
909% 1,229 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 238%
Great: 302%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 186 183 186 186 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 170
Mixed 110
SusWrite 185
122% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 110%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA MK5059GSXP 500GB
171GB free, PID fe01
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.7% Very poor
Read 25
Write 22.8
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 25
31% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
28% 0.33 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 23.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 23.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365 Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $528
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback