HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook Studio x360 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844F
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 12 '19 at 10:05
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-8950HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 228
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 583
42% 386 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 8451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.53
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.8% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 28.8
23% 27.7 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 33.4
25% 30 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1187 947 607 594 597 590 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,022
Write 897
Mixed 868
SusWrite 754
199% 885 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 68.1
232% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,078
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 687
549% 783 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 196%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
70.7% Very good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 18.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 24.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio x360 G5 Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback