Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime2 Days
Run DateNov 12 '19 at 01:34
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 392
52% 392 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.2
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.5% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 84.6
46% 68.5 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 54.2
48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1211 480GB SSD 754D117-533
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS121101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 282 152 104 100 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66% Good
Read 417
Write 391
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 175
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 29.8
81% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 25.5
90% 197 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback