Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '19 at 19:45
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 132
2-Core 261
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 734
80% 632 Pts
64-Core 780
48% 780 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 167
Parallax 135
124% 152 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 177
Splatting 123
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 124 118 121 121 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 477
Mixed 393
SusWrite 158
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 61.8
213% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 358
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
55GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,836
Write 1626
Mixed 704
307% 1,389 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 59.6
224% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,066
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 875
683% 943 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
WD WD1501FASS-00U0B 1.5TB
779GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 124 92 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 148
Write 138
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 127
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 142 134 140 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 155
Write 150
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 139
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 96%
USB Mass Storage Device 128GB
43GB free, PID 168a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
9.76% Terrible
Read 40.8
Write 15.2
Mixed 10
SusWrite 14.8
23% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.76%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.CAGMT.ARC0B 017A 78.CAGRW.4050C 017A 78.CAGMT.ARC0B 017A 78.CAGRW.4050C 32GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 29.1
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 27.1
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $651
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback