Toshiba Satellite P50t-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite P50t-A  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA VG10S
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '19 at 10:08
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 167
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 337
38% 298 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA47) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 7.73
Parallax 5.53
3% 5.68 fps
MRender 6.62
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 5.96
4% 4.78 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 430 426 414 410 416 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 416
Mixed 386
SusWrite 422
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 38.2
142% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 224
169% 221 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 101%
WD Elements 1TB
29GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 35 41 40 41 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 34.5
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 37.6
45% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73CB0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 19.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite P50t-A Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite P50t-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $346
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback