Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '16 at 15:59
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 76.9 2-Core 153 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 471 47% 383 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 375.95 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 119 Parallax 99.9 92% 110 fps	MRender 99.6 Gravity 105 Splatting 105 85% 103 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4042 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 899 (B1) Unknown 97 97 56 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 49 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 72 (F1) Unknown 99 99 28746348999	87.9% Excellent	Read 516 Write 393 Mixed 413 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 32.6 125% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 52.9 57% 93.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 124%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 939GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 171 168 6441 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1233 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5464 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1231 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 100 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1132 (C2) HDA temperature 116 100 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	95.2% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 154 Mixed 151 121% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 3.03 4K Mixed 0.36 124% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 112%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 869GB free Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 86 0 (02) Throughput performance 138 100 87 (03) Spinup time 127 100 25787957566 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2752 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 97 0 (08) Seek timer performance 136 100 32 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11403 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2696 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 99 99 131071 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 95 88 4460675 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 42 337641504 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2757 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2757 (C2) HDA temperature 187 109 249109086240 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	81% Excellent	Read 150 Write 132 Mixed 127 103% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.34 84% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 10.8 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.6 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	567x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	60x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $606

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16