| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | MSI MS-7519 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20081209 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 10 '19 at 16:34 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 51% |
PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
30%
Below average
|
32% 49.2 Pts
|
7% 51.7 Pts
|
2% 40.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.8%
Average
|
45% 69.2 fps
|
53% 66.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 169 180 172 167 204 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
33% 147 MB/s
|
69% 23.9 MB/s
|
31% 45.9 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
8GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 6.3 7.2 7.1 5.2 5.8 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
23% 18.8 MB/s
|
111% 2.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
11% 3.77 GB/s
|
6% 2.2 GB/s
|
26% 155 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-7519 Builds (Compare 35 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-7519
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 4x |
| GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples | 3x |
| GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 26% - Poor | Total price: $279 |