Alienware 17 R3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAlienware 17 R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0M5CM7
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180717
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 22:15
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 98
2-Core 169
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 502
51% 414 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Dell(1028 068B) ≥ 4GB; Sapphire Radeon RX 5700XT 8GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 112
Parallax 242
106% 161 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 129
Splatting 154
110% 131 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 353 309 300 299 278 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 985
Write 499
Mixed 400
SusWrite 322
122% 551 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 43.6
183% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 944
DQ Write 453
DQ Mixed 544
445% 647 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 145%
Great: 172%
Seagate ST1000LM044 HN-M101SAD 1TB
175GB free
Firmware: 2BD10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 86 88 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 90
Write 76
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 87.8
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
202% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 78%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 41
Write 40.7
Mixed 35
SusWrite 4.7
39% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
124% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 72%
ST975042 0AS 750GB
400GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 39.3
Mixed 29
SusWrite 37.1
49% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 24.2
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 17 R3 Builds (Compare 1,426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware 17 R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback