Asus AM1M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 21%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus AM1M-A  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 18:30
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Athlon 5150 APU R3
FS1b , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
18% Very poor
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 55.8
20% 41.8 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 81.7
13% 91.1 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Asus(1043 8623) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 13.351.1001.0
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.7
2% 7.5 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 6
Splatting 6.5
2% 5.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$13
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 129 123 63 55 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 150
Write 135
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 95.8
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown VS2GB1333D3 VS2GB1333D3 4GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 6.2
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 25%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical AM1M-A Builds (Compare 705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 25%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus AM1M-A - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $210
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback