Asrock E3C224-V+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock E3C224-V+ (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150601
Uptime	10 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '19 at 13:09
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 101 2-Core 192 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 376 49% 367 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 99 129 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 220 Write 185 Mixed 161 SusWrite 125 39% 173 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 30.6 106% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 155 120% 164 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 550GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 148 148 148 147 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 152 Mixed 94.7 SusWrite 147 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 109%
Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB-$36 2,469 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 111GB free Firmware: 0303 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 59 59 59 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 63.3 Write 63.8 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 58.8 41% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 38%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 95GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 108 106 110 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 148 Write 121 Mixed 79.6 SusWrite 107 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 270GB free Firmware: AM0P3M SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 71 71 72 73 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 86.9 Write 87.1 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 72.3 50% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 2x8GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 18.4 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 19.9 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical E3C224-V+ Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock E3C224-V+

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	1x
Xeon E3-1220 v3Intel $104Bench 69%, 5,273 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	1x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
HFM128GDHTNG-8310A 128GBBench 97%, 4,082 samples	1x

RAM
M391B5173QH0-CMA 4x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 274 samples	1x
ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G 9905403-518.A00LF ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G 16GBKingstonBench 32%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16