HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory90.2 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180209
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 12:44
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 55.4
2-Core 144
56% 94 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 650
59% 494 Pts
64-Core 1,614
100% 1,614 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000
HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.96
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 31.9
21% 27.2 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 22.1
23% 29.5 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 394 397 399 398 387 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 422
Write 409
Mixed 336
SusWrite 390
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 29.7
102% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 323
250% 343 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 124%
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB
161GB free
Firmware: 4L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 231 231 232 232 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55% Above average
Read 170
Write 184
Mixed 150
SusWrite 231
42% 184 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 19.7
84% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 52.8
79% 148 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55%
Great: 80%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: ABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 160 162 162 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 134
Write 156
Mixed 30
SusWrite 161
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 108%
USB Flash Disk 8GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21
Write 2.2
Mixed 5.2
9% 9.47 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 H... 96GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 31.3
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.3
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback