HP ProBook 640 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 640 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80FD
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 10:23
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 76
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 120
58% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 117
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Lighting 6.63
Reflection 9.58
Parallax 6.38
5% 7.53 fps
MRender 9.52
Gravity 6.07
Splatting 13.2
8% 9.59 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST500LM021-1KJ152 512GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 143 341 395 391 395 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 413
Write 116
Mixed 137
SusWrite 296
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 10.1
79% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 50
DQ Mixed 94.6
89% 147 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 103%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
245GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 642 304 339 340 340 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.3% Very good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 23.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 23.2
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 640 G2 Builds (Compare 1,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 640 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback