Asus F1A75-M PRO/CSM

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-M PRO/CSM (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '16 at 01:02
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 83.6 1-Core 51.7 2-Core 103 51% 79.5 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 206 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D 4,197 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	5.27% Terrible	Lighting 6.77 Reflection 7.31 Parallax 6.16 6% 6.74 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 6.48 5% 5.75 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.27% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 22029048 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 -100115687655885 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 56 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 30 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 25 34 77311639577 (C2) HDA temperature 25 34 77311639577 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 22029048 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 22029048 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 22029048 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13334 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6578 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6578 (F2) Unknown 0 0 15712 (F4) Unknown 99 99 196673593	57.8% Above average	Read 517 Write 192 Mixed 242 69% 317 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 11.9 70% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 93.9 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 53.6 57% 93.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 85%
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$28 11,469 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 464GB free Firmware: TD27 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 232747001 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9653 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 283779969 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 34491 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 174 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 253 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 62 437846042 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 44 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 235293 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 77309411354 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 52 45 232747001 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57% Above average	Read 104 Write 94.9 Mixed 89.2 72% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.3 86% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 426GB free, PID 0201 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	43% Average	Read 104 Write 102 Mixed 68.5 115% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.2 69% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 5,448 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.3% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 14.5 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9.9 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-M PRO/CSM Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M PRO/CSM

CPU
A4-3400 APUAMD $80Bench 36%, 2,796 samples	1x
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	1x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

RAM
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	1x
RipjawsZ DDR3 1866 C9 1x4GBG.SKILLBench 37%, 15 samples	1x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus F1A75-M PRO/CSM

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M PRO/CSM

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)