Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 02:35
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 596
64% 510 Pts
64-Core 1,184
73% 1,184 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.2
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.5% Good
Lighting 75.5
Reflection 81.2
Parallax 95.8
62% 84.1 fps
MRender 76.4
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 63.9
58% 72.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,096
Write 1,505
Mixed 653
312% 1,418 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 53.6
209% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 716
DQ Write 554
DQ Mixed 619
468% 630 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 750GB-$310
59GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,094
Write 2988
Mixed 2,668
720% 3,250 MB/s
4K Read 287
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 219
821% 235 MB/s
DQ Read 859
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 674
519% 712 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 136 138 136 135 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 138
Write 138
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 135
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 91%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
630GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 127 127 125 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 137
Write 171
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 128
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
294% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
320GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 94 93 94 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 67.1
Write 84
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 93.4
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 69%
JMicron Tech 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0562
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 622 639 641 643 645 642 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 310%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 132 143 146 147 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 147
Write 157
Mixed 98.6
SusWrite 141
184% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
210% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$201
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 32.3
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback