Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Q87M-E  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 16:29
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 190
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 482
51% 407 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 117
Parallax 110
92% 113 fps
MRender 97.8
Gravity 102
Splatting 104
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR050
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 456 284 247 242 233 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 397
Write 459
Mixed 361
SusWrite 318
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 33.1
122% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 320
243% 327 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 99%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 236GB
76GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 108 105 101 67 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 457
Write 129
Mixed 130
SusWrite 90.4
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 19.7
108% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 48.1
82% 165 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 108 108 108 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 97
Write 90
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 109
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.2
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback