MSI MS-16P8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL63 9RCX
MotherboardMSI MS-16P8  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateNov 08 '19 at 09:09
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 88.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 220
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 602
67% 525 Pts
64-Core 577
36% 577 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
MSI(1462 127D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4097
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 33.1
Parallax 33.8
35% 36.7 fps
Gravity 44.3
Splatting 39.6
37% 41.9 fps
Poor: 22% Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADXA0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 696 689 693 657 707 614 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 818
Write 579
Mixed 629
SusWrite 676
152% 675 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 54.9
184% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 953
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 465
380% 560 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 158%
Great: 166%
hp v265b 16GB
8GB free, PID ba07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 12 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.66% Terrible
Read 29
Write 13.2
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 13.5
22% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.66%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 11.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P8 Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback