TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock B450 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock B450 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 18:55
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 216
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 317
43% 321 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 68.6%
 Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
Asus(1043 04C4)
CLim: 1600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.2
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.7% Very good
Lighting 87.8
Reflection 80
Parallax 127
72% 98.3 fps
MRender 83.7
Gravity 93.5
Splatting 112
81% 96.5 fps
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 74.7%
 Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,312
Write 1,438
Mixed 1,246
367% 1,665 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 71.7
239% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 693
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 634
461% 604 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
90GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 133 130 131 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 142
Write 138
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 131
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 78.5%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 32.9
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 27.2
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 95.6%
 Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B450 Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450 Pro4

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples1,009x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $81Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples904x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples313x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples327x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples243x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples200x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples138x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples98x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples98x
RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples316x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples258x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples254x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback