MSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A90
MotherboardMSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 15:54
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 86.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 1,134
98% 836 Pts
64-Core 1977
122% 1977 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 188
Parallax 176
148% 182 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 176
Splatting 123
114% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 638 312 307 299 292 282 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,747
Write 1484
Mixed 785
SusWrite 355
243% 1,093 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 47.9
216% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,066
DQ Write 1,030
DQ Mixed 685
614% 927 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 203%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
91GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 153 146 167 134 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 159
Mixed 84
SusWrite 147
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
417GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 136 136 135 134 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 130
Write 92
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 133
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 114%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
110GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 88 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 114
Write 106
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 87
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 69%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
632GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 167 165 167 168 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 43.5
Write 113
Mixed 42
SusWrite 168
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
83% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61
323GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 95 96 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 98.7
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 93.8
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 63.3
MC Mixed 34.8
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 11.9
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90) Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A90)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $903
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback