Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120806
Uptime13.8 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 12:20
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3680-$180
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 95.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 209
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 617
64% 517 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3200
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.3% Good
Lighting 86.7
Reflection 89.2
Parallax 86
71% 87.3 fps
MRender 84.4
Gravity 80.2
Splatting 71.4
64% 78.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 130 31 120 40 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.3% Above average
Read 273
Write 176
Mixed 186
SusWrite 94
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 25.4
89% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 106
100% 156 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 639GB
488GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 98.5
Mixed 94.1
SusWrite 103
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 20
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 56.9
70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback