Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemSamsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP540U3C-A01CN
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 10:21
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 124
53% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 126
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3304
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 2.62
3% 3.64 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 7
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 196 187 219 228 269 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 352
Write 290
Mixed 278
SusWrite 220
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 13.2
53% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 153
136% 211 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 124%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 64GB
58GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.7 9.8 10 8.8 9.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 9
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 9.2
20% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.9
128% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 18%
SDXC Card 256GB
237GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 15 15 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 17.6
Write 16.3
Mixed 15.6
SusWrite 14.8
22% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.8
123% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Kingston 9905469-055.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.8% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.6
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback