HP Z840 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Z840 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2129
Memory122.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '19 at 21:37
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 199
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 807
73% 612 Pts
64-Core 3,243
201% 3,243 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 33.6
20% 28.1 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 29.1
Splatting 27
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1TB
762GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 163 38 100 118 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 437
Write 381
Mixed 280
SusWrite 104
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 13.6
55% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 29.4
41% 76.9 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 54%
Toshiba AL14SEB120N 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: DH01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 61 60 61 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 181
Write 59.7
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 60
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7MFR4N-UH 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 87.7
MC Write 50.1
MC Mixed 47.4
176% 61.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 150%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: HP Z840 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback