Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150129
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '19 at 12:15
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Memory 76.1 1-Core 46.3 2-Core 92.7 46% 71.7 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 187 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Gigabyte(1458 22D7) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.1% Below average	Lighting 36.6 Reflection 61.5 Parallax 75.9 30% 58 fps	MRender 61.9 Gravity 55.7 Splatting 51 46% 56.2 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300 13,412 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 210 151 162 233 21 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.4% Good	Read 251 Write 236 Mixed 212 SusWrite 167 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 68.5 4K Mixed 30.8 112% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 34.4 63% 126 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 101%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 40GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 48 48 46 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 46.5 Write 46 Mixed 33.1 SusWrite 47.3 32% 43.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-478.A00LF 2x4GB 351 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.8% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 11.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 8.8 20% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	16x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	6x
A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	9x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	3x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	2x

SSD
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	2x
M378B5273CH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 58%, 1,445 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $213

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16