Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 26 '16 at 00:44
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 44%
CPU Throttled 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3517U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 22.6
2-Core 43.8
33% 45.5 Pts
4-Core 56.6
8-Core 64.2
8% 60.4 Pts
64-Core 70.6
4% 70.6 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 2.75
3% 3.88 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.04
4% 4.79 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 435
Write 50.5
Mixed 97.7
42% 194 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 8.07
4K Mixed 5.22
32% 8.98 MB/s
DQ Read 13.7
DQ Write 8.29
DQ Mixed 5.25
5% 9.08 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 48%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
23GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
6.6% Terrible
Read 6.49
Write 5.73
Mixed 6.19
8% 6.14 MB/s
4K Read 2.51
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.88
82% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 12.6
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback