Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-M (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151218
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '19 at 13:17
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 95.6 1-Core 106 2-Core 210 80% 137 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 387 53% 394 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.73% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 4.27 Parallax 4.09 4% 4.25 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.73% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89 9,651 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10362 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 129 132 133 133 135 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 251 Write 133 Mixed 142 SusWrite 130 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 21.1 72% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 66.8 DQ Mixed 64.3 58% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 48%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 154GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 460 466 467 441 330 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 459 Mixed 423 SusWrite 436 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 47.7 153% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 368 277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 129%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 109 109 109 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 89.8 Write 92.3 Mixed 79.4 SusWrite 108 68% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-083.A00LF 2x8GB 245 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.3% Good	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 19.9 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 19.2 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 55.1 73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	333x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	219x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	179x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	82x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	58x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	71x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	43x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	35x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	21x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 23,732 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $442

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16